Skip to content
Aug 4 / Nick

Messaging & Positioning: Learn from the Pros

You didn't think these just sold themselves did you?

You didn't think these just sold themselves did you?

Tag line: “One Size fits all”

Messaging Statement: With 120GB of storage, iPod classic is the take-everything-everywhere iPod.*

 *Please note bolding, italics, and underlined were used to link portions of the messaging statement to supporting pillars.

Pillars

  • Capacity
  • Classic Beauty
  • iTunes store to fill it          

Proof Points (Product characteristics)

Capacity

Classic Beauty

iTunes Store

30,000 Songs Sleek Organized multimedia & jukebox
150 hours of video Eye catching Podcasts & audio books
25,000 Photos Quintessential Silver or striking Black Video & Movies

 Branding I’ve been told is like a promise, and the product is executing on that promise. If your messaging doesn’t align with the product you will erode your customer good will and likely not be successful. The iPod example is perfect because the messaging for the classic has remained mainly untouched the entire time it’s been in existence.

 

Take-aways: Does the messaging (promise) match the product? Do the pillars support the promise? Do the proof points provide solid support to the pillars?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

3 Comments

leave a comment
  1. Mike / Oct 23 2009

    You call this “appreciation”? Your sarcasm is only thinly veiled guy.

  2. Nick / Oct 23 2009

    Are you kidding this is probably the most successful brand identity excercise I’ve seen.

    They were selling this product for 5 years with the same messaging the whole time.

    This is not sarcasm. Its solid branding.

  3. Mike / Oct 23 2009

    Let me clarify:

    “Does the messaging (promise) match the product? Do the pillars support the promise? Do the proof points provide solid support to the pillar”

    That sounds like sarcasm. The information provided does not link the specific points of their product pitch to sales figures. You simply provide some product information, and then ask these questions. Can you see how it could be interpreted as sarcasm.

    If you want to show brand success, give us some quantifiable data. Show us the number of times and ways this product was exposed to the public compared to the number of units that were sold. How many were returned because of defective batteries? What percentage of the market share do they have now, compared to years previous and how does the introduction of new products (such as Zune) affect that market?

    We have anecdotal evidence that the iPod is a branding success; however, I’ve never really found data to support that “feeling”. As the post stands now, Apple’s position is not clear, and we cannot see how these elements interact with each other. I could simply counter that Zune is a more successful brand because I like it (and my opinion is more important then everyone else).

    Make the case for solid branding if that is what you feel.

    Please and thank you – Mike

Leave a Comment