Is Google Price-Fixing with AdWords?

Update on Google AdWords Complaint
I failed to discuss quality score in my original post which has led to some interesting comments on some Web 2.0 sites we’ve posted onto.
To set the record straight:
We ran the ads for a total of 3 days, we only received 3 impressions in that time, and our relevancy score was 6/10. While 6/10 isn’t the best relevancy score I feel that score plus the short period of time that I was given to run the ad was absurd. When most sites utilize CPM (cost per million) the idea that 3 impressions (sorry I heard originally 100 but that was for a different key word) is enough data to double my costs in my mind is not appropriate.
Lets also not forget that there is absolutely no one else advertising on this word.
My Take on the Responses
I see a lot of experts who are all too comfortable with the realities of working with Google and that scares me a bit. I look at a company with so much power who can make a flippant decision and it is a concern as a businessman. The suggestion that the person with the dominating power is just right and there can be no complaints or concerns is asinine, especially when their impact on advertisers is so skewed.
This of course isn’t my forte, I’m not the internet marketer for this site I’m a brand and product manager specialist. We’ll have some more updates straight from Gustav on the coming campaign.
Original post:
So I’m pretty new to Google and AdWords I’ll admit that straight away. In just a few weeks time of using the product I’ve seen some rather abnormal behavior all of my keywords keep going up weekly in acquisition costs.
Devil’s Advocate
Other companies keep bidding up the words you are using.
This is just the cost of doing business
More competitors are coming into the market
Basic Supply and Demand
My Take
It’s highly irregular to think that every single last keyword has gone up in price consistently.
It feels like I’m bidding against myself
The words I was selecting were relatively low in priority previously so why would there be a sudden rush to that real-estate?
I am Bidding Against Myself
This one is the most glaring issue I’ve seen. I selected the keyword “Messaging and Positioning” a term that had zero people paying for advertising. A week later Google asked me to double my cost of acquisition even though still no one is using this keyword.

Looks like Wyoming so why am I paying NYC prices?
This Feels Like Price-Fixing
You have the dominate share of the internet, you offer no transparency in the bidding process, and to top it off you raise the price on something 1 person is bidding on? That sounds a lot like utilizing your market power to price fix.
Filing an Anti-Trust Complaint
I decided to file a complaint to the federal government on this. If you’ve seen a similar issue feel free to leave a comment, and if you want to file a complaint here is the information.
E-mail antitrust.complaints@usdoj.gov
Mail Citizen Complaint Center
Antitrust Division
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Room 3322
Washington, DC 20530
Phone 1-888-647-3258 (toll free in the U.S. and Canada) or 202-307-2040
My Complaint letter:
Complaint Against: Google
Complaint explanation:
Recently I’ve started using Google Ad-words. I felt this was really the only real option to drive traffic to my site as they wield about 70% of the search market share. Their process of selecting ads for placement is through an open bid auction. However, there is no visibility into this process, we’re expected to believe that Google will appropriately handle the auction and not inflate the prices.
After a couple of weeks I’ve seen every single ad word that we have selected has gone up in price like clockwork. Now this could just be the nature of the business, maybe more companies have become interested in a word etc. I can appreciate that argument. Except, that we put an ad in for the words “messaging and positioning” and that too has gone up in price.
The problem with the “messaging and positioning” is this:
1. No one else was advertising under these key words when we started.
2. Still no one is advertising under these key words as seen from the attached screen shot.
3. Google has asked us to increase our advertising price $.10 to $.20 doubling our cost
4. Google has not communicated any across the board increase in the cost of these services.
5. With no additional demand for the keyword I’m being asked to bid against myself essentially.
6. There is no transparency in how Google does business
7. To me this is an unfair business practice and should be investigated as a possible exertion of Google’s dominate market-share for the purpose of price fixing.

A plausible answer was given to this question on LinkedIn: “Maybe your quality score went down”
My thought on this is if Google increases the cost without communicating back what their reason is that’s not an acceptable practice. The fact that Google can determine the worth and value of my specific business and then assign a disparate pricing structure to me vs. a competitor is also a concern.
In the end since this blog is mostly dedicated to branding and M&P I feel strongly that the ad was placed in good faith on my part and doubt highly this was the reason for the price increase. Additionally if the ad is even remotely relevant and I’m the only person bidding then doesn’t it make sense that my ad is therefore the most relevant ad they have?
The price will go up if your ctr is bad. Google exists primarily for searchers – if they don’t keep coming, google loses it’s position as the top seacrh engine. Searchers want results that are relevant to their search query. If you’re not delivering that in your sponsored link, goolge will penalise you. You’re not bidding against yourself – google is telling you you are doing something that searchers don’t like, and you’re not listening.
Sally,
I’ll admit I didn’t check the relevancy score before I posted this. Here are the facts direct from my account though.
6/10 relevancy
the ad was only served 3 times over 3 days.
This to me doesn’t indicate enough data for a company like Google to double my cost of acquisition, especially given that click-through rates are not extremely high to begin with on most keywords.
Thanks for the indepth response though. It seems like a solid explanation, but I still feel that the change was unwarranted based on the small amount of data and the speed in which my price was jacked up.
Hello from Russia!
Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you?
I’m open to anyone posting on the blog so long as they link back. Even though this isn’t my finest post.
Adwords is really good in driving traffic to your website. however, they are very strict right now and they would not easily approve websites that they thought have low quality content. *-